Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $70.0 vs $82.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 79% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-3210 - 175 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 34% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-3210 - $0.47 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 413 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.99
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |