Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $70.0 vs $85.13
- Up to 14% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - $0.42 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3210 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7871 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
85%
Price, $
$85.13
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |