Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $59.99 vs $79.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - $0.48 vs $0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11561 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |