Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4146 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-560 - 245 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $49.99 vs $60.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-560 - $0.2 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
207
84.48979591836735%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
46.51162790697675%
Price, $
$60
83%
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
27.635683094198377%
Multi-Core
932
34.56973293768546%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 73 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |