Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1575 days newer than Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i3-530 - 173 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-530 - $0.26 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2604 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |