Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4151 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 140 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $52.02 vs $521.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76360 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |