Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 1766 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $68.02 vs $498.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4765T - $1.48 vs $9.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
46
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14138 minutes ago
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |