Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $68.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-10600 - $0.38 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G4900 - 183 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
178
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15334 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |