Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1310 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $68.02 vs $429.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i7-5820K - $0.36 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G4900 - 202 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
188
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |