Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 205 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $68.02 vs $557.04
- Up to 87% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-7920X - $0.57 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G4900 - 131 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14155 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
13%
Price, $
$557.04
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |