Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4765T - 275 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $498.95 vs $560.04
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-7920X - $1.88 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
92%
Price, $
$560.04
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $560.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
265
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |