Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1942 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - 208 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $435.0 vs $552.85
- Up to 35% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - $2.09 vs $3.2 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $552.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |