Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3900X - 158 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3900X - $2.75 vs $2.9 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $395.0 vs $435.0
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12085 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12086 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |