Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900 - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $412.9 vs $435.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77888 minutes ago
Buy for $412.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77890 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
2473
90.58608058608058%
Multi-Core
13044
75.75352807944712%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |