Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900 - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $277.33 vs $435.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - $2.48 vs $3.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
84%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$277.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $277.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |