Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-9590 - 202 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $298.02 vs $435.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-13900F - $1.67 vs $2.15 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |