Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $68.02 vs $587.46
- Up to 88% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-9920X - $0.27 vs $2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G4900 - 257 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
251
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14394 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
11%
Price, $
$587.46
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |