Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 281 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $68.02 vs $188.88
- Up to 61% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-7640X - $0.26 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 54 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G4900 - 281 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4897 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
38%
Price, $
$188.88
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 112 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |