Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2068 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $429.95 vs $435.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in New World than Core i7-5820K - 122 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74046 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
68.07511737089203%
Multi-Core
5443
64.63602897518109%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |