Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3057 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 29% better in Valorant than Core i7-5820K - 963 vs 749 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $368.99 vs $429.95
- Up to 33% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-5820K - $0.38 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
963
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$368.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |