Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2136 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-5820K - 317 vs 307 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $379.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 14% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-5820K - $1.2 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
317
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |