Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 627 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900K - 137 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $410.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $3.01 vs $3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
99%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$410
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |