Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2583 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 193 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 105 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $298.02 vs $399.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.76 vs $2.07 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8746 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 220 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |