Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $429.95 vs $448.88
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 120% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-5820K - 97 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 53% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-5820K - $4.63 vs $9.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10083 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$448.88
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $448.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |