Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $429.95 vs $505.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 39% better in New World than Core i7-5820K - 152 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74034 minutes ago
Buy for $505 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
42.74134119380987%
Multi-Core
5443
33.136490929014975%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |