Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $275.98 vs $529.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900F - $1.06 vs $1.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900 - 287 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
261
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2877 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
57%
Price, $
$529.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2876 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |