Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2068 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-5820K - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-5820K - $3.48 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $429.95 vs $435.0
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
121
96.8%
Value, $/FPS
$3.55/FPS
98.02816901408451%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
68.07511737089203%
Multi-Core
5443
64.63602897518109%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |