Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3416 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-5930K - 164 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $529.99 vs $549.95
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-5930K - $3.23 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11354 minutes ago
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |