Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1513 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3770 - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $78.02 vs $122.03
- Up to 38% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3770 - $0.5 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |