Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i7-4930K - 55 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4930K - $1.82 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $89.95 vs $100.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3923 minutes ago
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |