Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1304 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - 181 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $51.6 vs $57.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - $0.29 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |