Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Celeron G4900 - 702 vs 697 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $68.02 vs $85.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-2600K - $0.1 vs $0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9038 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
697
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |