Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than FX-8120 - 119 vs 98 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 33% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $39.99 vs $59.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing New World than Celeron G6900 - $0.41 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12728 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |