Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4380 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G6950 - 208 vs 189 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 21% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $47.48 vs $59.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G6900 - $0.25 vs $0.29 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12196 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
189
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Alder Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 73 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |