Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 23 than FX-6300 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-6300 - $68.02 vs $74.04
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-6300 - $0.43 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |