Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 600 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 487 vs 478 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $57.99 vs $109.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.12 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
478
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
52%
Price, $
$109.99
52%
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
487
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
