Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $80.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10320 - $0.4 vs $0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i3-9100F - 203 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
200
98.52216748768473%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
57.97101449275364%
Price, $
$139.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
89.27875243664717%
Multi-Core
3669
79.31258106355382%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |