Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - 109 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $69.99 vs $120.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10320 - $0.71 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |