Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 635 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10320 - 190 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $76.52 vs $139.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-10320 - $0.4 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
94.73684210526315%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
51.28205128205129%
Price, $
$139.99
54%
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
69.16853932584269%
Multi-Core
4626
62.03567118144026%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |