Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 72% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-860 - 122 vs 71 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $48.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-10320 - $0.68 vs $0.98 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3976 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |