Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2674 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-860 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $39.0 vs $48.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-860 - $0.25 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |