Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $48.0 vs $51.6
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3637 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3638 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |