Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3514 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $48.0 vs $56.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - $0.44 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-860 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3586 minutes ago
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |