Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3930T - 147 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $39.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i3-10320 - $0.32 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
33.684210526315795%
Price, $
$139.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58285 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
123
83.6734693877551%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
35.60753736192333%
Multi-Core
948
20.492866407263293%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |