Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - 201 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $105.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - $0.52 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
94.5273631840796%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
70.27027027027027%
Price, $
$139.99
75%
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$105
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $105 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
73.56596558317399%
Multi-Core
4626
53.424182931054396%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |