Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 20% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 171 vs 142 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $85.76 vs $120.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-10320 - $0.6 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
142
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |