Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $39.0 vs $135.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930T - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74994 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
51.844843897824035%
Multi-Core
948
28.77959927140255%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |