Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1764 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-6500 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-6500 - $139.99 vs $189.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-6500 - $0.92 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
150
98.68421052631578%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
72.44094488188976%
Price, $
$189.95
73%
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1177
76.47823261858349%
Multi-Core
3217
69.54172070903589%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |