Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 49% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G3258 - 383 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $51.36 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
39.83105912930474%
Multi-Core
1074
23.216601815823605%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |