Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $60.0 vs $139.99
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
76.15334632878492%
Multi-Core
3228
69.77950713359273%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |